Government vs. Science


I think it’s safe to say that we can’t rely on the federal government (especially any part of the government administered by the executive branch) for accurate science.

Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt choose a physician with experience in Christian pregnancy counseling (no contraceptives and discouragement of abortion) to oversee federal reproductive health programs. That’s just the kind of horrible irony they are so good at.

We face a serious environmental situation, both from peak oil and from global warming. You know that, and I know that. Yet, in August the Environmental Protection Agency closed their libraries in order to be fiscally responsible. They didn’t just close the libraries to the public but to their own employees. Now that is selective fiscal responsibility. The whole situation is difficult to fathom. The EPA even claims that they that they have no authority to regulate emissions. Fortunately, twelve states, several cities and more than a dozen environmental groups are challenging the decision. This case will be heard by the Supreme Court. That may not fill you with hope, but it’s better than no hearing at all.

I know, the war between the Bush Administration and science is not new. These have just been a few stories in the news over the past couple of weeks. Here are a few more from the past few years.

Update 12/2: A BuzzFlash alert notes that the new House Democratic leaders are already addressing the EPA’s library closings, at this point through a relatively strongly worded letter to cease destruction and disposition of library holdings.

Leave a Reply


 
Connecting the dots of political news stories that whip me into a screaming frenzy, while fighting the rise of extremism and reinforcing the necessity of community.